Artificial Intelligence Law Hub  |  New Delhiinfo@ailawhub.org  |  +91 11 46584441
AI Law HubArtificial Intelligence Law Hub
Artificial Intelligence Law Hub

Tracking how the law meets artificial intelligence.

AI Law Hub tracks, studies and examines the development of AI law: legal developments in AI jurisprudence, the concepts and instruments proposed for regulating the AI ecosystem, and the impact of AI on society.

The Hub’s frameworks

From accountability for AI to liability for AI agents.

AI is moving from systems that assist to agents that act. The Hub’s flagship work answers the question that shift creates; its foundation framework sets out who answers for AI outcomes generally.

Flagship framework  |  Agentic AI

Duggal Global Agentic AI Liability Framework

A Conceptual, Normative, and Operationally Precise Blueprint for Accountability, Responsibility, and Governance in the Era of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Agents

Agentic AI systems set goals, plan, use tools and act without continuous human direction. When such an agent causes loss, existing doctrines struggle to say who answers. The Framework addresses that liability gap and proposes a five-tier liability stack allocating responsibility across the agentic AI value chain. It is a proposal for scrutiny, not law in force.

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21273446

5Tiers in the liability stack
1.1Version, March 2026
4Companion agentic AI works on Zenodo
Foundation framework

The AI Accountability Framework 2026

A proposed legal architecture for holding identifiable natural and legal persons accountable for the outcomes of AI systems, with eleven foundational principles and eleven legal doctrines for courts and regulators. A proposal, not law in force.

Read on Zenodo
11Principles
11Doctrines
3.0Version, Jan 2026
About the Hub

A focal point for the law of AI, as it is being written.

AI law is being made in parallel in legislatures, regulators, courts and international bodies. The Hub follows those developments, examines the legal questions they leave open, and contributes proposals of its own for scrutiny.

TrackLegislation, regulation and policy on AI across jurisdictions.
StudyEmerging AI jurisprudence and the doctrines courts reach for.
ExamineThe gaps: liability, evidence, agency and accountability.
FacilitateDialogue among lawmakers, regulators, industry and academia.
Focus areas

Six questions the Hub keeps returning to.

01

Agentic AI liability

The legal questions raised when AI systems act on their own: who is liable, on what authority the agent acted, what record exists, and who carries the loss.

02

Accountability and liability

Who answers for AI outcomes: allocation of responsibility across developers, deployers, operators and users, and the doctrines courts can apply.

03

Comparative AI regulation

How the European Union, India, the United Kingdom, Singapore and international bodies are choosing to govern AI, and where they differ.

04

AI, evidence and the courts

How machine-generated records are preserved and proved, and how courts and justice systems themselves adopt AI.

05

AI, data and privacy

Where AI meets data protection law, including the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and the GDPR.

06

The Global South

A governance architecture that works for countries outside the major regulatory blocs, and their voice in global AI norms.

AI Law Landscape

The instruments that shape AI law today.

A short, verified reference to the principal legislation, treaties and frameworks on AI, with links to the official source. Status as at 10 November 2026.

European UnionIn force

EU Artificial Intelligence Act

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. In force since 1 August 2024, with obligations applying in phases.

Official source
European UnionApplies 9 Dec 2026

Revised Product Liability Directive

Directive (EU) 2024/2853. Treats software and AI as products for no-fault liability; applies from 9 December 2026.

Official source
European UnionWithdrawn

AI Liability Directive (proposal)

The separate proposal on fault-based AI liability was withdrawn in 2025.

Council of EuropeTreaty

Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law

CETS No. 225. Opened for signature on 5 September 2024; enters into force after five ratifications, including three Council of Europe member states.

Official source
United NationsResolution

General Assembly resolution 78/265

Seizing the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development, adopted 21 March 2024.

Official source
OECDPrinciples

OECD AI Principles

Adopted 2019 and updated 2024; the first intergovernmental standard on AI.

Official source
UNESCORecommendation

Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

Adopted by UNESCO Member States in November 2021.

Official source
IndiaGuidelines

India AI Governance Guidelines

Released by MeitY on 5 November 2025. Voluntary guidelines relying on existing laws and sectoral regulators, with seven guiding principles.

Official source
IndiaPhased

Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and DPDP Rules, 2025

Rules notified 13 November 2025 in three phases; substantive obligations apply from 13 May 2027; penalties up to INR 250 crore.

Official source
SingaporeFramework

Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI

Launched by IMDA in January 2026 on the principle that humans remain accountable for what agents do.

Official source
United KingdomConsultation

ICO call for evidence on agentic AI

Opened 8 October 2026 on the data protection risks of agentic AI; responses due 20 November 2026.

Official source

Status changes: always confirm against the official source before relying on it. This page is information, not legal advice.

Library

Instruments and papers on cutting-edge AI law.

Twelve works by Dr. Pavan Duggal, each deposited on Zenodo with a permanent DOI: agentic AI liability, AI agency, black-box evidence, hijacked agents, accountability rights, the Global South and AI consciousness. Proposals for scrutiny, not law in force.

25 November 2026  |  Online

International Agentic AI Accountability and Liability Summit 2026

When an AI agent acts, who answers, on what record, and under what law? Day 1 of ICCC 2026, convened by Dr. Pavan Duggal.

Summit details
Dr. Pavan Duggal
Dr. Pavan Duggal, Chief Executive, AI Law Hub
Chief Executive

Dr. Pavan Duggal

Chief Executive, AI Law Hub
Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India

Dr. Pavan Duggal’s practice and scholarship span cyberlaw, cybercrime, cybersecurity law, data protection and artificial intelligence law. His recent work addresses the accountability and liability of agentic AI systems. He is the author of 203 books and has convened the International Conference on Cyberlaw, Cybercrime & Cybersecurity every year since 2014.

  • Chief Executive, AI Law Hub
  • Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India
  • Founding Forum Director & Global Chair, International AI Accountability Forum
  • President, Global AI Accountability, Law & Governance Institute
  • Conference Director, International Conference on Cyberlaw, Cybercrime & Cybersecurity (ICCC)
  • Convenor, Global South AI Law & Governance Dialogue
  • Convenor, International Agentic AI Accountability & Liability Summit
Contact

Write to the Hub.

For research collaboration, institutional partnerships, speaking requests or comments on the Hub’s work.

Send a message

The Hub does not provide legal advice through this form.

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email.
Please choose a topic.